In the spirit of clearing out all the useless crap from 2007 to get ready for great new things in 2008, I am finally forcing myself to write a book review of a book I’ve had sitting here in my office for over a month. Against my better judgement, I hung on to it, figuring I’d get around to writing about it once my wrists stopped aching. That has sort of happened, but in the meantime (despite my hopes it would wander off and find itself a new home) the annoying book hasn’t gone away.
As readers can likely guess, it was a freebie, arriving at my door accompanied by a bottle of wine. The free wine didn’t make the book more interesting, and the book didn’t make the wine more palatable, although, presumably if I drank the whole bottle of wine before reading the book, that might have improved the situation.
The truth is that I don’t know a whole lot about wine, and This Food, That Wine: Food and Wine Pairing Made Easy! by Angie MacRae, Stacy Metulynsky and Chris Knight should have been just the primer I needed. Unfortunately, the! foreshadowing! evident! in! the! title! did! not! offer! enough! warning! about! the! excessive! use! of! exclamation! marks!!!!! Because these gals are perky -in that “someone please pass me a fork to jam into my temple” kind of way.
Do they know about wine? Probably, but I honestly didn’t have the patience to read much of the text and learn from them. The premise of the books is that sommelier Stacy offers some basic info on wine, different varieties, etc, while chef Angie offers recipes to pair with various wines. Angie apparently doesn’t believe that vegetarians like to drink wine, because the vegetarian offerings are a sparse side of meagre.
The writing in general is like having a conversation with a ditzy girlfriend:
Nebbiolo reminds me of tar and roses. I know that sounds like a bad glamour rock band from the 80s, but seriously, next time you have the opportunity, take a glass of Nebbiolo, give it a swirl, and tell me you don’t smell the distinctive nose of sweet perfumed rose petals, and pungent, earthy tar.
Okay, first it’s Guns and Roses, the genre in the 80s was called GLAM rock, not glamour rock, and sweet sassy molassy I hate it when writers write as if they’re talking directly to their readers. Do they really expect readers to give them a call after tracking down a bottle of Nebbiolo to confirm their assessment? This makes them sound like the hosts of some bad cooking show. Oh… wait… these gals are the hosts of a show by the same name on Food TV. That explains a lot.
I suspect that the demographic for this show (never having seen it) is probably women, and that the premise, like so many shows on the Food Network, is of the dumbing down variety. Wine info coming from your best girlfriend, or a reasonable, if overly perky facsimile, is probably easier to take than from the cliched wine snob in a tweed jacket and bow tie, slurping and spitting and making the amateurs feel foolish. They’re supposed to make their readers and viewers feel comfortable and unintimidated.
Which probably works on the folks who think Ray Ray is a great cook, but mostly makes me want to run screaming into the streets and punch the first woman I see with blonde hi-lights and frosted eyeshadow.
As for the wine, it was a bottle of Plantatree Chardonnay, a carbon-positive wine. Shipped in bulk containers from California to Niagara and bottled in PET plastic bottles to reduce the wine’s carbon footprint. Except that it’s still California wine shipped to Ontario. Why not use an Ontario wine? And plastic bottle are almost as ooky as tetra paks. Sure it’s great that they plant a tree for each bottle sold, but hey… why not just do something nice for the environment without making a profit from it? The effort here really isn’t worth the end result, as the wine itself is too light and insipid. It would be perfect for a group of perky girlfriends to sip while watching This Food That Wine on the food network. Me, I had one glass and dumped the rest down the drain.




